1) Well they added back math resource instead of inclusive/collaborative. I have only been trying to get this since end of 2nd grade-Grant is now in 5th and failing 1st quarter math. Gotta love 30% on math benchmark when 50 something is meeting the standard.
2) They did not move Grant into Resource room for reading or writing despite 1 and 2s on his report card 1st quarter and a drop in his reading fluency. The reg.ed teacher his advocate it is the Resource teacher who does not understand IDEA.They did add some reading goal but that is not enough will have to deal with it again in December if he is still needing teacher guidance to complete anything involving reading/writing.
3) The school is trying to put behavior plan in place-Grant is exhibiting some disturbing behavior at school along with verbal perservation. I think a formal FBA might be needed if things continue-breaking school property, defiance, not following rules.
4) Grant actually attended part of the meeting. I had shared a letter Grant wrote (they ignored the one he wrote last year) and they called him in-he did GREAT

5)There is still bullying/teasing going on and the Resource teacher's comments have me concerned. Grant could not go to sleep last night-he kept saying "so and so said that NOBODY cares about me" and he kept verbally listing who did care. My heart breaks as none of his peers can stand him since he repeats things over and over.
**** What the county does not get that is is OKAY to move a child back from inclusion to resource or even self-contained if that is the child's LRE and the child is NOT receiving FAPE and/or affecting the other student's ability to receive FAPE. On tape the Resource clearly says she is concerned that he is moving backwards but if that is what is appropriate for GRANT than do it. Especially when parental concern and now grades,etc point to issues with current placement. **
Wanted to add that they are going to try out metronome therapy-the county just purchased program and trained some professional in it and it worth a try.
2) They did not move Grant into Resource room for reading or writing despite 1 and 2s on his report card 1st quarter and a drop in his reading fluency. The reg.ed teacher his advocate it is the Resource teacher who does not understand IDEA.They did add some reading goal but that is not enough will have to deal with it again in December if he is still needing teacher guidance to complete anything involving reading/writing.
3) The school is trying to put behavior plan in place-Grant is exhibiting some disturbing behavior at school along with verbal perservation. I think a formal FBA might be needed if things continue-breaking school property, defiance, not following rules.
4) Grant actually attended part of the meeting. I had shared a letter Grant wrote (they ignored the one he wrote last year) and they called him in-he did GREAT


5)There is still bullying/teasing going on and the Resource teacher's comments have me concerned. Grant could not go to sleep last night-he kept saying "so and so said that NOBODY cares about me" and he kept verbally listing who did care. My heart breaks as none of his peers can stand him since he repeats things over and over.
**** What the county does not get that is is OKAY to move a child back from inclusion to resource or even self-contained if that is the child's LRE and the child is NOT receiving FAPE and/or affecting the other student's ability to receive FAPE. On tape the Resource clearly says she is concerned that he is moving backwards but if that is what is appropriate for GRANT than do it. Especially when parental concern and now grades,etc point to issues with current placement. **
Wanted to add that they are going to try out metronome therapy-the county just purchased program and trained some professional in it and it worth a try.
Comment